UFOs may not necessarily be “objects” nor could they be “flying” – – Dr. Jacques Vallee

keelvallee1

(Dr. Jacques Vallee with John A. Keel – – “Human beings are under the control of a strange force that bends them in absurd ways, forcing them to play a role in a bizarre game of deception” – Dr. Jacques Vallee)

by Norio Hayakawa, September 24, 2016:

Surprising as it may sound, after all my personal efforts of many years in researching and investigating “UFOs”, I cannot even come close to stating what is truly behind this phenomenon.
It still remains a mystery to me.

However, after all these years, the bottom line in my view is that we have yet to come up with a single physical, solid, hard, tangible, irrefutable evidence to conclusively prove that the UFO phenomenon is physical manifestation of physical extraterrestrial spacecraft (with or without physical extraterrestrial entities as its occupants) from beyond this earth.

You can name all the cases you want:
Roswell (1947)….. Rendelesham (December, 1980)….. JAL Flight 1628 case over Alaska (November 17, 1986)….. the Socorro incident in New Mexico (April 24, 1964)….. Betty and Barney Hill (1961)….. Travis Walton (1975)….. The Phoenix Lights (1997)…..etc., etc., ad nauseum.

But again as I stated above, this is the bottom line:

We have not come up with any single, concrete evidence to prove beyond a shadow of doubt that some “UFOs” are “nuts-and-bolts” physical craft operated or manipulated and occupied by physical entities from adavanced extrraterrestrial civilizations.

This is why I came to consider that the entire phenomena could even be some form of “psycho-spiritual” manifestations or such by a power which we cannot comprehend simply by physical pursuit, a power which apparently is capable of presenting an “instant” (but only “temporary”) “appearance” or “illusion” of being a physical phenomenon to the observer. Some suggest that it could even be a momentary, holographic intrusion from some “parallel intelligence”.

Some others even suggest that it could perhaps be some form of temporary “time-slip” or an interdimensional “intrusion”.

We just don’t have the answer.

It seems to me that as a possible projection from “another” reality, the phenomenon appears to be able to materialize and de-materialize at will.

But more significant is its apparent inability to stay in our dimensional realm except for a few moments at a time, or only for a short period of time.

In other words, it seems apparent that they’re unable to survive in our physical dimension except for a very brief period of time, at a time.

This is why it seems to me that in many cases a “UFO”, after making an initial appearance to what I call a “pre-selected” observer (or observers), simply appears to take off at a tremendous speed and disappear into the distance as if utilizing some form of advanced propulsion system.

But could this be a deception?

In other cases, “UFOs” seem to simply hover or “float” (again, as if they’re utilizing some form of a propulsion system capable of “floating”) before taking off or even de-materializing.

But again, could this be a deception?

As Dr. Jacques Vallee suggested quite often, “UFOs” may not necessarily be objects nor could they be “flying” as we understand “flying” by the use of any propulsion system.

Yet they are even said to be able to affect our physical parameters (such as radar, etc.)

As an important review, let’s list Dr. Jacques Vallee’s 5 basic propositions in regards to this phenomenon:

1) “The things we call unidentified flying objects are neither objects nor flying.
They can materialize, as some reliable photographs seem to show, and they violate the laws of motion as we know them”.

2) “UFOs have been seen throughout history and have consistently received (or provided) their own explanation within the framework of each culture.”

3) “UFO reports are not necessarily caused by visits from space travelers. The phenomenon could be a manifestation of a much more complex technology. If time and space are not as simple in structure as physicists have assumed until now, then the question ‘Where do they come from?’ may be meaningless; they could come from a place in time. If consciousness can be manifested outside the body, then the range of hypotheses can be even wider.”

4) “The key to an understanding of the phenomenon lies in the psychic effects it produces (or the psychic awareness it makes possible) in its observers.
Their lives are often deeply changed, and they develop unusual talents with which they may find it difficult to cope.
The proportion of witnesses who do come forward and publish accounts of these experiences is quite low; most of them choose to remain silent”.

5) “Contact between human percipients and the UFO phenomenon always occurs under conditions controlled by the latter. Its characteristic feature is a factor of absurdity that leads to a rejection of the story by the upper layers of the target society and an absorption at a deep unconscious level of the symbols conveyed by the encounter.
The mechanism of this resonance between the UFO symbol and the archetypes of the human unconscious has been abundantly demonstrated by Carl Jung, whose book FLYING SAUCERS makes many references to the age-old significance of the signs in the sky”.

Please also click and read the following item:

The UFO phenomenon as demonic activity?

2010-25-valleeandhyneck

– –

Norio Hayakawa’s CIVILIAN INTELLIGENCE NEWS SERVICE

E-mail = noriohayakawa@gmail.com

FACEBOOK = https://www.facebook.com/fernandon.hayakawa

Advertisements

19 thoughts on “UFOs may not necessarily be “objects” nor could they be “flying” – – Dr. Jacques Vallee

  1. One of the things that came to my attention as I read the article is what happens when you are in a group of people, for instance, my first experience, where I was with seven others, and we all viewed the same event. Two were adults, three teenagers, including me then, and three children. Or a few years later, another event witnessed by my mother and brother and myself, where we all saw the same thing. If the event was influenced by our own mind, wouldn’t we have seen our own version of the sighting?

    Like

  2. If you haven’t figured out what UFOs are, then you would do well to read the Bible. The sixth chapter of Ephesians is most enlightening.

    Like

    • Many years ago i found the way to videorecord another dimensions and their inhabitants, there are many different species and things, and i know some of them can cross to our side and is possible we do too. Could be somebody interested in this project?

      Like

  3. Does this mean that you do not believe the Roswell crash happened in ’47, when I was 12.? I believe sincerely ,that it happened ,and the coverup continues to this day.
    I do give Credence, to yor Theory, perhaps from other Planets, and new Technologies ,coming along from them as well..A very interesting read. Sincerely ,Barb😊🇨🇦👽

    Like

    • The Roswell case of 1947 is still controversial and inconclusive. There are many possible explanations for the incident. Besides, it would be extremely difficult for me to accept that a spacecraft from highly advanced civilization that traverses a vast distance could even crash upon arrival. The concept of something “crashing” is simply a human concept based on human understanding of mechanism.

      Like

  4. Seems to me that for every hypothesis that has come from all the years of study of this phenomena by countless investigators etc , there is ample reason to believe the findings such as with Dr Valles as being true and valid as well as not . It can’t be defined in any one view or another.
    Randelsheim forest incident had a real touchable craft on the ground and witnessed by many for a sustained amount of time. If we are to believe Roswell, so with this too. There are parts somewhere, bodies too. Radar has also documented many events. Credible military personal claim witness to crafts and so on.
    People with no high aspirations in thinking ,get to see them, and people who meditate and search with spiritual aspirations and desires, never do. Nothings adds up in a sense ,and yet it does in another. What works for me with some of these objects is along the inter dimensional concept that they are not “traveling “etc, but rather appearing cross our visible frequencies . Perhaps they are always there ? Yet there is ample evidence that they are also moving thru the observable sky . Then there are so called abductions and so on. Add infra red and other spectrum observances and the situation is even more perplexing. Memory is problem . Why can’t i recall dreams in complete detail from start to finish, or when I do, most are wiped away in no time. We just don’t understand enough about consciousness.

    Like

  5. Although I am familiar with the concepts in this article and indeed some of it’s assumptions may be true as true can be, I think there’s a lot of evidence to the contrary. For example, if there is any truth in the many Roswell accounts, then dead bodies equate something you can touch: ergot as real as a tortoise.. if there is any truth in the ‘retrieved craft’ evidence, then there are craft which can also be touched: ergot a spaceship of some kind. I am sure advanced civilisations with technologies far exceeding our capabilities can use holographic technology to appear as apparitions. Furthermore, if the mastery of gravity and tinkering with space-time are sufficient, then any and perhaps all contact with advanced beings may appear magical, dimensional and not quite real, (except when they’re dead and their ships have crashed on Earth).

    We have to be careful and pragmatic when discussing ‘explanations’ for things we know very little about. It seems to me, there are more questions than answers surrounding the subject of ‘others’ and I can imagine that there are plenty of good reasons why advanced beings would limit their interactions with us, perhaps for our own good, or perhaps with a sense of complete indifference, depending on their attitude towards us.

    There may be a multiplicity of origins and explanations to UFO’s and ‘so called’ aliens. Some maybe indeed be dimensional in origin, the result of time-based distortions, or just plain tech smart flesh and blood creatures in addition to consciousness projections, organic engineered beings, artificial intelligence or something we may label as spiritual in origin.

    One thing seems clear, people have observed phenomena over a long period of human history and they often report their experience using cultural reference points limited to their own local knowledge. These reports seem to advance in complexity in step with our own understanding of science. This is perhaps reflective of and a clue to the real identity of these fleeting travellers. I think there is more than one answer to who and what they are, because probably there are visitor from lots of different places & spaces

    Like

  6. Dr. Vallee’s assertions fit most of the evidence.
    This review of his many years of outstandingly creative work on the subject of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) reinforces my own view that there has to be a dynamic interaction (relationship) between the viewer(s) and the UAP. That is, while some sighting reports over the centuries involve multiple witnesses (of the same physical stimulus) others groups of witnesses located nearby and also capable of seeing the UAP do not do so. Does this suggest some kind of focused, projected control mechanism by the UAP upon just one group of witnesses and not the other? Does it suggest some kind of group psychological control originating only within a particular group of human observers, perhaps along the lines of congruent suggestability. I have to agree with Jacques that, so far at least, we have no firm so-called “nuts-and-bolts” evidence that UAP are an ET phenomenon. But any mystery this deep calls for even more creativity and effort on our part following the long-tested traditions of science.
    Richard F. Haines

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s