Those who promote unsubstantiated UFO claims or UFO “artifacts”

THOSE WHO PROMOTE UNSUBSTANTIATED UFO CLAIMS OR UFO “ARTIFACTS”.

-from Robert Sheaffer:

(QUOTE)

“In 2013, there was a UFO discussion panel held at the The National Atomic Testing Museum in Las Vegas.

They had a special exhibit on “Area 51.”

During the question and answer session, Las Vegas skeptic John Whiteside asked about the supposed “authentic alien artifact” in the Area 51 exhibit.

The moderator referred the question to reporter George Knapp, in the audience, who  (scandalously)  was the source of that “artifact.”

Knapp, a debonair raconteur, has made a career out of reporting on weird stuff like alleged saucers at Area 51  (peddling the unsubstantiated claims of Bob Lazar),  Robert Bigelow’s Haunted Ranch in Utah, etc.

Who had verified that supposed artifact?

The Russians, and others?  Who exactly?  No answer.

The moderator encouraged the two to take the discussion off-line afterwards.

Immediately after the close of the questions, Whiteside says he was approached by Jim Brown who identified himself as the Acting Director of the Museum.

Brown berated him for asking such a question, claiming that it threatened their funding.

If a Museum’s funding is threatened by asking a legitimate question, the fault lies not with the questioner, but with the Museum.

Whiteside went looking for George Knapp after this, no more than five minutes later, to find that he had quietly slipped out the door.

I’m thinking it’s very likely that this was one of the same “UFO artifacts” that Robert Bigelow had.  If so, one would scarcely need to modify any buildings to house it.”

(UNQUOTE)

Thanks, once again, to Robert Sheaffer.

As I stated elsewhere many many times, I am a realist who believe that the UFO phenomenon itself seems to be real.

But to me, UFOs do not constitute conclusive evidence of physical extraterrestrial visitations by physical extraterrestrial, biological entities in physical extraterrestrial spacecraft of any kind.

There may be more to this phenomenon than physical ET hypothesis.

I am also highly skeptical of the existence of authentic UFO artifacts.

………

Norio Hayakawa’s CIVILIAN INTELLIGENCE NEWS SERVICE

E-mail = noriohayakawa@gmail.com

Facebook = http://www.facebook.com/fernandon.hayakawa

Norio Hayakawa’s YouTube Channel

Five reasons to be skeptical about that New York Times UFO story – – December 20, 2017

“In a shameless attempt to help Tom DeLonge’s money for his music company called TO THE STARS ACADEMY, the New York Times released this so-called UFO video.  It’s being paraded by UFO “elites” like George Tsukalous, George Knapp and Nick Pope.  They’re claiming it’s evidence of aliens.” – – Tim Doyle, UFO SEEKERS, December 21, 2017

by Stephen Pope, FLYING  MAGAZINE – – December 20, 2017

https://www.flyingmag.com/five-reasons-to-be-skeptical-about-that-new-york-times-ufo-story

(QUOTE)

That New York Times story about a secret government UFO program and close encounters between Navy airmen and unexplained flying objects over the vast Pacific Ocean reads like a science fiction story.

Which was how the paper wanted it.

Scratch beneath the veneer of the borderline-sensationalist reporting and we’re left with many more head-scratching questions than answers.

The eyewitness account of former F/A-18 Super Hornet pilot David Fravor is certainly intriguing  – – and yet he wasn’t even a part of the original Times story, which focused on the money trail behind the UFO hunting effort and interviews with those who are “absolutely convinced” that aliens exist and that UFOs have visited Earth.

The Times story touched off a flurry of breathless reporting by media outlets around the world, most of which seem to have failed to notice that the Times’ original reporting has some major problems with it.

(According to the GODDARDS JOURNAL, many major media are falsely associating this footage — the Gimbal footage — with the witness account of pilot David Fravor, involved in a different case known as the USS Nimitz case. [1,2] 

There is no supplementary testimony from the pilots heard in this video.

According to the NY Times, the date and location of this footage has not been revealed by the DoD.

In contrast, the date and location of the Nimitz case in which pilot Fravor was involved is well known.

The site of the group (TO THE STARS) that is promoting the footage in this video as evidence of extraterrestrials clearly distinguishes it from the 2004 Nimitz case.

About the UFO footage in this video, The New York Times says: “Defense officials declined to release the location and date of the incident.”

In contrast, the location and date of the USS Nimitz case pilot David Fravor was involved in is known. [2] So the target seen in this video cannot be from the same case about which Fravor testifies.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Nimitz_UFO_incident

[2] http://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/16/us/politics/unidentified-flying-object-navy.html)

(CLICK TO ENLARGE ABOVE PHOTOS, courtesy of Mick West, METABUNK. ORG – – “To me the Nimitz footage seems consistent with (>50 miles away) plane flying away from the camera.  It looks very similar to the proven example of the same thing as previously explained Chilean Navy UFO video footage)

Now back to the New York Times erroneous news article:

HERE ARE FIVE OF THE MOST GLARING:

  1. The Pentagon didn’t release those UFO videos, an official connected to a Las Vegas company who resigned in October did.  (Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, as well as Luis Elizondo, supporter of Tom DeLonge’s TO THE STARS ACADEMY OF THE ARTS AND SCIENCES)

The New York Times story makes it seem as though the release of the videos came from high-level government officials, glossing over the information that the disclosures were actually spearheaded by an official who led the Pentagon’s relatively small UFO hunting program and who has since resigned to join a Las Vegas company called  TO THE STARS ACADEMY OF THE ARTS AND SCIENCES  that is seeking private funding for more UFO research.  That’s a major distinction that most in the media appear to be ignoring since the original Times report appeared.

  1. The Pentagon UFO program’s prime contractor  (Bigelow Aerospace) claims to possess mysterious metal alloys that exhibit mystical powers — but won’t show them to anyone.

Bigelow Aerospace, Nevada-based company, which received most of the Pentagon funding for the UFO research project, reportedly collected mysterious alloys from UFOs that physically affected people who interacted with them.  Never mind there are obvious conflicts of interest between Bigelow Aerospace’s billionaire founder Robert Bigelow and his friend, former Nevada Sen. Harry Reid, who pushed for the $22 million in funding for the government’s UFO program in the first place – –  what we want to know is, why all the continued secrecy surrounding these alloys and other UFO findings?

(for more on Robert Bigelow, click the following about:  Eccentric billionaire executive Robert Bigelow claims “Aliens are here on Earth”)

  1. One of the authors of the Times article wrote a book about UFOs and doesn’t even work for the paper.

After its UFO story appeared in its Sunday edition, the Times divulged that one of the bylined authors wasn’t an employee of the paper but rather is a UFO hunter named Leslie Kean who has written a book on the subject with a forward by John Podesta, another well-known UFO conspiracy theorist who used to throw “X Files” viewing parties in the White House when he worked there during the Clinton years.  In fact, not only did Kean help write the article, she was the one who pitched the story to the Times in the first place.  At best, shouldn’t she merely have been interviewed for the story?  Why was she permitted to be a part of the writing and vetting process?

  1. In one of the videos, a Navy airman says “That’s a [bleeping] drone.” Why are we doubting him?

In the only UFO video released with pilot audio accompanying it, a Navy airman describes the object he is following as a “drone.”:

(CLICK TO ENLARGE ABOVE SEGMENT)

The object does not appear to do anything particularly unusual in this video.  Nobody claims that the object did anything unusual.   The Pentagon won’t even say where and when the video was shot.  Was it a drone?

(It could have been anything, with no conclusive evidence of anything.)

  1. There are plausible explanations for these videos and eyewitness accounts.  Where is the rest of the evidence?

Far from proving that our planet has been visited by aliens in aerodynamically advanced space craft, the videos and eyewitness accounts that emerged in the Times story and elsewhere merely provide a starting point for further investigation and inevitably lead to more questions.  That’s what makes all of the secrecy and intrigue still surrounding this story so frustrating for the public.  The New York Times has dangled this carrot in front of the world, and now leaves us all wondering if the people who claim to know more will ever divulge that information, or merely continue to direct us to the “Donate Here” buttons on their websites.

(UNQUOTE)

And finally, if you would like to see an in-depth discussion on all this, please go to:

Mick West, METABUNK:

“To me, this Nimitz footage seems consistent with (>50 miles away) plane flying away from the camera.  It looks VERY similar to the proven example of the same thing as a previously explained Chilean Navy UFO video footages”:

https://www.metabunk.org/2004-uss-nimitz-tic-tac-ufo-flir-footage.t9190/

……..

Norio Hayakawa’s CIVILIAN INTELLIGENCE NEWS SERVICE

E-mail = noriohayakawa@gmail.com

Facebook = http://www.facebook.com/fernandon.hayakawa

Norio Hayakawa’s YouTube Channel

Those who promote unsubstantiated UFO “artififacts”

(ABOVE, Lee Spiegel’s photo of the supposed “Authentic Alien Artifact” in the Area 51 exhibit of the National Atomic Testing Museum in Las Vegas, Nevada – 2013)

December 24, 2017 – courtesy of Robert Sheaffer: http://badufos.blogspot.com

(QUOTE):

In the days since that New York Times story  (of December 16, 2017)  burst on the scene, attention is starting to turn to the following puzzling lines in that story:

By now, everybody knows that contracts obtained by The Times show a congressional appropriation of just under $22 million beginning in late 2008 through 2011.  The money was used for management of the program, research and assessments of the threat posed by the objects.

The funding went to Robert Bigelow’s company, Bigelow Aerospace, which hired subcontractors and solicited research for the program.

But, according to the New York Times story, under Mr. Bigelow’s direction, the company modified buildings in Las Vegas for the storage of metal alloys and other materials that Mr. Elizondo and program contractors said had been recovered from unidentified aerial phenomena.

Bigelow’s company modified buildings in Las Vegas for the storage of artifacts gathered from UFOs? 

That does not seem to be possible, but that is exactly what the Times story says.

How many tons of alleged UFO artifacts must Bigelow have to need to modify buildings to store it?

– – – – –

By the way, in 2013, there was a UFO discussion panel held at the The National Atomic Testing Museum in Las Vegas. They had a special exhibit on “Area 51.”

During the question and answer session, Las Vegas skeptic John Whiteside asked about the supposed “authentic alien artifact” in the Area 51 exhibit.

The moderator referred the question to reporter George Knapp, in the audience, who (scandalously)  was the source of that “artifact.”

Knapp has made a career out of reporting on weird stuff like alleged saucers at Area 51, Robert Bigelow’s Haunted Ranch in Utah, etc.

Who had verified that supposed artifact?

The Russians, and others.  Who exactly?  No answer.

The moderator encouraged the two to take the discussion off-line afterwards.

Immediately after the close of the questions, Whiteside says he was approached by Jim Brown who identified himself as the Acting Director of the Museum.

Brown berated him for asking such a question, claiming that it threatened their funding.

If a Museum’s funding is threatened by asking a legitimate question, the fault lies not with the questioner, but with the Museum.  Whiteside went looking for George Knapp after this, no more than five minutes later, to find that he had quietly slipped out the door.

I’m thinking it’s very likely that this was one of the same “UFO artifacts” that Bigelow had.  If so, one would scarcely need to modify any buildings to house it.

(UNQUOTE)

Thanks, once again, to Robert Sheaffer.

As I stated elsewhere many many times, I am a realist who believe that the UFO phenomenon itself seems to be real.   But to me, UFOs do not represent conclusive evidence of physical extraterrestrial visitations by physical extraterrestrial, biological entities in physical extraterrestrial spacecraft of any kind.  There is more to this phenomenon than the ET hypothesis.  I am also highly skeptical of the existence of authentic UFO artifacts.

……..

Norio Hayakawa’s CIVILIAN INTELLIGENCE NEWS SERVICE

E-mail = noriohayakawa@gmail.com

Facebook = http://www.facebook.com/fernandon.hayakawa

Pentagon’s unjustified UFO research “funding” revealed – – a total waste of our hard-earned tax dollars

This is what I call a total waste of our hard-earned tax-dollars.
Most of the $22 million  (our hard-earned tax dollars)  spent on this program went to an aerospace research company run by Harry Reid’s friend, eccentric billionaire Robert Bigelow.

Sure, $22 million may be a small amount to some folks, but to us regular tax-paying citizens, $22 million is still $22 million.  The government owes us more detailed explanation than this.

(No one can say that the UFO phenomenon itself is not real.   In fact, I believe that the phenomenon seems to be real.  But the way to get to the bottom of this mystery has not been really efficient.)

Harry Reid initiated the program, which ultimately spent more than $20 million, through an earmark after he was persuaded in part by eccentric aerospace titan and hotel chain founder Robert Bigelow, a friend and fellow Nevadan who owns Bigelow Aerospace, a space technology company and government contractor.  Bigelow, whose company received the bulk of the research contracts, was also a regular contributor to Reid’s reelection campaigns, campaign finance records show, at least $10,000 from 1998 to 2008.  Bigelow has spoken openly in recent years about his views that extraterrestrial visitors frequently travel to Earth.  He also purchased the Skinwalker Ranch in Utah, the subject of intense interest among believers in UFOs.  Reid and Bigelow did not respond to multiple requests for comment.”  – Bryan Bender, POLITICO MAGAZINE, December 16, 2017.

A bad picture – – after spending $22 million of our hard-earned tax dollars, all we get is another “vintage” fuzzy video of a fuzzy object  (which could have been anything),  with no conclusive evidence of anything.  In a shameless attempt to help Tom DeLonge’s TO THE STARS ACADEMY, the New York Times released this meaningless video.  It’s being paraded by UFO “elites” like George Tsukalous, George Knapp and Nick Pope.  They’re all claiming it’s evidence of aliens.  We should call it a theft of our hard-earned tax dollars, giving our money to a private firm run by eccentric billionaire and UFO believer, Robert Bigelow:

By the way, the Pentagon didn’t release those UFO videos, an official connected to a Las Vegas company who resigned in October did.  (Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, as well as Luis Elizondo, supporter of Tom DeLonge’s TO THE STARS ACADEMY OF THE ARTS AND SCIENCES)

(According to the GODDARDS JOURNAL, many major media are falsely associating this footage — the Gimbal footage — with the witness account of pilot David Fravor, involved in a different case known as the USS Nimitz case. [1,2] 

There is no supplementary testimony from the pilots heard in this video.

According to the NY Times, the date and location of this footage has not been revealed by the DoD.

In contrast, the date and location of the Nimitz case in which pilot Fravor was involved is well known.

The site of the group (TO THE STARS) that is promoting the footage in this video as evidence of extraterrestrials clearly distinguishes it from the 2004 Nimitz case.

About the UFO footage in this video, The New York Times says: “Defense officials declined to release the location and date of the incident.”

In contrast, the location and date of the USS Nimitz case pilot David Fravor was involved in is known. [2] So the target seen in this video cannot be from the same case about which Fravor testifies.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Nimitz_UFO_incident

[2] http://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/16/us/politics/unidentified-flying-object-navy.html)

(CLICK TO ENLARGE ABOVE PHOTOS, courtesy of Mick West, METABUNK. ORG – – “To me the Nimitz footage seems consistent with (>50 miles away) plane flying away from the camera.  It looks very similar to the proven example of the same thing as previously explained Chilean Navy UFO video footage)

As far as the TO THE STARS Gimbal footages are concerned, it could have been anything:

It could have been anything, with no conclusive evidence of anything.

———-

by Laura Italiano, NEW YORK POST – – December 16, 2017:  https://nypost.com/2017/12/16/pentagons-search-for-ufos-revealed/

(QUOTE)

For five years, from 2007 to 2012, the Pentagon ran a $22 million program that investigated reports of UFOs.

The “Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program” was the brainchild of Sen. Harry Reid, (D-Nevada) who was then the Senate majority leader, according to Politico and the New York Times, which broke the news of the program Saturday, December 16, 2017.

The program investigated accounts by military personnel and commercial pilots who witnessed unidentified aircraft that appeared to move or hover without visible signs of propulsion or lift, the reports said.

One of the sightings investigated had been captured on videotape, released in August, showing a white oval object the size of a commercial plane as it was chased by a pair of Navy fighter jets off of San Diego in 2004, the Times said.

And while funding ended five years ago, officials who worked on the program and now have other positions in the Pentagon continue to investigate accounts of unexplained aircraft phenomenon brought to them by military service members, the Times said.

The reports did not say what, if anything, has come of the program’s investigations, beyond the drafting of classified documents describing the phenomenon.

“I’m not embarrassed or ashamed or sorry I got this thing going,” Reid, who retired from Congress this year, told the Times.

“I think it’s one of the good things I did in my congressional service. I’ve done something that no one has done before.”

Most of the $22 million spent on the program went to an aerospace research company run by Reid’s friend and fellow Nevadan, Robert Bigelow, the Times said.  Bigelow, a devout believer that aliens have visited Earth, is currently working with NASA on producing space modules for human use.

READ THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE:

Eccentric billionaire executive Robert Bigelow claims “Aliens are here on Earth”

And finally, if you would like to see an in-depth discussion on all this, please go to:

Mick West, METABUNK:

“To me, this Nimitz footage seems consistent with (>50 miles away) plane flying away from the camera.  It looks VERY similar to the proven example of the same thing as a previously explained Chilean Navy UFO video footages”:

https://www.metabunk.org/2004-uss-nimitz-tic-tac-ufo-flir-footage.t9190/

…….

Norio Hayakawa’s CIVILIAN INTELLIGENCE NEWS SERVICE

E-mail = noriohayakawa@gmail.com

Facebook = http://www.facebook.com/fernandon.hayakawa

Norio Hayakawa’s YouTube Channel

 

Area 51 getting ready for B-21 development and testing?

(CLICK TO ENLARGE ABOVE, courtesy of David Centiotti, THE AVIATIONIST)

Although the initial stages of development of B-21 Raider is being conducted at Northrop’s S-4 Facility at Air Force Plant 42 in Palmdale, California, the second half of the development and testing will likely be scheduled at Area 51 in Nevada.   This includes both the unmanned and manned versions (according to a source).

Here is an interesting precursor to this possible development, written by Tom Demerly of THE AVIATIONIST:   https://theaviationist.com/2017/11/28/are-we-seeing-b-21-raider-development-and-testing-activity-at-area-51/

(QUOTE)

“We’re not sure what is happening inside (and close to) the restricted Nevada Test and Training Range (NTTR), but after visiting the area earlier this month, we are reasonably certain something significant is taking place right now.  The massive area, reported to be 4,531 square miles, is one of the most secure national security sites and is closed to the public.

Earlier this month we drove the remote roads along the perimeter of the NTTR between Las Vegas, Nevada and Beatty, Nevada on the way to and from the Jedi Transition low-level flying area in Death Valley National Park.  While this is one of the emptiest, most barren stretches of paved highway in the U.S. in just a few hours we made a number of interesting observations.

Sometime after 3:00 AM across from Creech Air Force Base we saw a military-aged male with a beard in civilian clothes and a medium-sized piece of luggage or large lunch box board an airport-style shuttle bus and drive away on Highway 95 west of Creech.  The vehicle drove a significant distance west and north on the highway before we lost sight of it.  There is almost nothing out there.  On the trip back that night we saw an F-117 fuselage covered by a tarp being transported on a flatbed truck in the dark west-bound on Highway 95.  Earlier in the day someone had gotten photos of it by the side of the road.

In less than 24 hours, on one stretch of road at the outskirts of a massive 4,000+ mile testing range, we saw that much activity.

Moreover, the following day, on November 14, 2017, an authority on the area referred to only as “G” of lazygranch.com, shot photos of an F-117 flying with a two-seat F-16.  The very same day, in the afternoon a similar  (or maybe the same with a different configuration)  two-seat F-16, carrying the Lockheed Martin’s AN/AAS-42, an IRST  (Infra Red Search and Track)  pod (theoretically capable to detect stealth aircraft by their IR signature), with sparse markings was photographed flying through the Jedi Transition.  The photo was good enough that we could identify a patch worn on the right shoulder of each of the aircraft’s flight suits:

(CLICK ABOVE FOR ENLARGEMENT)

The patches suggest the crew are associated with the famous “Red Hats” opposing forces test unit and the 53rd TEG Det 3, the unit thought to have replaced the 4477th “Red Eagles”, another opposing force simulation and testing unit.

Separate and additionally from those sightings near or around Tonopah Test Range, journalist Tyler Rogoway at The War Zone, has been a keen observer of the Nevada Test and Training Range.  Rogoway reported on the appearance of several new construction projects at Area 51, notably, a new “U” shaped taxiway, vehicle roadway and most interestingly, a large aircraft hangar.

If you compare satellite imagery of Area 51 beginning in 1984 you see a progression of small changes followed by the significant addition of a long, second, parallel runway.  Work on the second runway began in 1990 and seemed complete in about 1992.  From 1999-2000 several new buildings appeared in satellite photos:

(CLICK TO ENLARGE ABOVE)

In 2001-2002 an intermediate vehicle road connecting taxiways and runways was built.  And most recently, in 2013, a major new construction project began at the southwest corner of the area.  Soon after, in July 2014, the U.S. Air Force issued a request for proposal for a new, long range, low-observable strike aircraft.  The project became the LRS-B  (Long Range Strike Bomber).  From 2014 to 2016 a large, new hangar was built at the southwestern corner of the facility.  The structure appears to be nearly large enough to house an aircraft the size of the current B-1B Lancer bomber.

The latest satellite photos show what appears to be new engine test facilities, and most significantly, the southern taxiways and hangar in new-looking condition.  Comparing the satellite photos of the facility going back to 1984, the two most significant, visible expansions are the second runway in 1990 and the new southwest square taxiway and hangar building beginning in 2014.

An analysis of satellite images over time reveal the major construction projects at Area 51/Groom Lake since 1984 including the most recent hangar and taxiways.

Noted aerospace imaging expert Al Clark told TheAviationist.com:

“In the general Groom Lake image our best reference is one of the F-16s parked on the west side of the base.  The F-16 length is approximately 50-feet.  Building number one, which is almost directly west of the F-16s is approximately 120’x120’.  It looks to be an engine test/run-up hangar. The building that is more interesting is approximately 250-feet wide by a length of 275-feet.

(CLICK ABOVE FOR ENLARGEMENT)

This is interesting because the B-2 wingspan is only 172-feet, so this is [possibly] designed to house large aircraft, in my opinion possibly the B-21 Raider.  To the southwest of that structure it looks like what could be a weapons storage facility.  The smaller bunker is approximately 75-feet long by 30-feet wide, and the larger bunker is approximately 75-feet wide and 100-feet long.  Those are fairly large weapons bunkers.  The general placement of the munitions depot tells me that there is something pretty volatile in it because they are keeping it away from the main base at Groom Lake.”

Is what we are seeing evidence of the LRS-B program development and the B-21 Raider?

While there are likely several other major developmental programs underway including a new manned or unmanned reconnaissance and strike platform  (the RQ-180 spy drone is one of them)LRS-B and B-21 are the most mature and most talked about in official channels and, as a result, most conclusions point to something related to their development out at Area 51 in the new hangar.

Prior to her departure from the office, former Air Force Secretary Deborah James told media, “Our 5th generation global precision attack platform will give our country a networked sensor shooter capability enabling us to hold targets at risk anywhere in the world in a way that our adversaries have never seen.”  Her comments about the LRS-B program and B-21 acknowledge both the capability and necessity of the program, and may suggest the urgency of it as the Air Force maintains its small fleet of B-2 Spirit low-observable long range strike aircraft against a growing demand for its unique capability.

That might mean we are seeing the B-21 Raider development program take shape right under our noses at Area 51.  Or this is what they want us to believe:

(CLICK ABOVE FOR ENLARGEMENT)

(UNQUOTE)

…….

Norio Hayakawa’s CIVILIAN INTELLIGENCE NEWS SERVICE

E-mail = noriohayakawa@gmail.com

Facebook = http://www.facebook.com/fernandon.hayakawa

Area 51-based F-16D performs rare pass through the Star Wars Canyon hours after an F-117 is spotted chased by a two-seater F-16

by David Cenciotti, THE AVIATIONIST – – November 25, 2017:  https://theaviationist.com/2017/11/25/area-51-based-f-16d-performs-rare-pass-through-the-star-wars-canyons-hours-after-f-117-is-spotted-chased-by-two-seater-f-16/

(QUOTE)

“On November 14, 2017  (the day after an F-117 was photographed on a trailer south of Creech Air Force Base)  at 09.20 AM LT, another F-117 was spotted flying north of Rachel, Nevada.

The stealth jet was not flying alone  (or close to another F-117 as happened, for instance, in 2016)  but it was chased by a two-seater F-16.

Noteworthy, few hours later on the very same day  (November 14) at about 1:15 PM – 1:45 PM, photographer David Atkinson took some shots of an F-16D performing two passes through the famous Star Wars Canyon.”

(UNQUOTE)

California’s STAR WARS CANYON  (“The Jedi Transition“)  has definitely become America’s plane spotting jewel.

“Located in the western United States on the edge of the Death Valley and the southern outskirts of Nellis Range, home of Area 51, it is America’s best place to see combat aircraft training for their dangerous low-level infiltration role.

The Jedi Transition is one the the few places on earth where you point your camera down to shoot combat aircraft photos  (the other famous one being the Mach Loop).   The aircraft actually fly beneath you through the canyon.  And to say it is breathtaking is an understatement.”  – – courtesy of Tom Demerly, THE AVIATIONIST

(CLICK ABOVE TO ENLARGE THE MAP OF STAR WARS CANYON – The Jedi Transition)

(CLICK TO ENLARGE THE ABOVE AIR CHART OF STAR WARS CANYON – The Jedi Transition)

(CLICK ABOVE FOR ENLARGEMENT – – F-16Ds, based at Area 51)

Here is why fighter pilots love to fly through the Star Wars Canyon in Death Valley, California:

F-18, A-10 and F-35 low level flying at STAR WARS CANYON in Death Valley, California:

…….

Norio Hayakawa’s CIVILIAN INTELLIGENCE NEWS SERVICE

E-mail = noriohayakawa@gmail.com

Facebook = http://www.facebook.com/fernandon.hayakawa

Air Force aims for laser weapons on a fighter jet by 2021

by William Howard, STARS AND STRIPES  – – November 20, 2017  – – https://www.stripes.com/news/air-force-aims-for-laser-weapons-on-a-fighter-jet-by-2021-1.498652

ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO:

(QUOTE)

The Air Force Research Laboratory is forging ahead with a high-energy laser designed to shoot down drones, incoming rockets and mortar rounds and hopes to have a demonstration model ready by 2021, officials say.

The Self-protect High Energy Laser Demonstrator program, or SHiELD, which launched this year, seeks to equip supersonic warplanes, such as the B-1 Lancer, F-35 Lightning and F-22 Raptor, with defensive lasers mounted in external pods.

The Air Force wants a high-energy laser system compact enough to complement the internal cannon and missiles equipped on its fighter jets.

The new system uses a type of optical fiber as the light-emitting material, instead of the neodymium-doped crystals used in conventional solid-state lasers.  Since fiber can be coiled, more power can be packed into a compact system.

“We have shown that a powerful directed energy laser is now sufficiently light-weight, low volume and reliable enough to be deployed on tactical vehicles for defensive applications on land, at sea and in the air,” Lockheed Martin laser weapons expert Robert Afzal said in a statement.

The electric-powered laser is a significant departure from the chemical laser found in the defunct Boeing YAL-1A airborne laser test bed.  The YAL-1A was scrapped after 16 years of development in 2011 after Defense Secretary Robert Gates told Congress it was too costly and not nearly powerful enough to shoot down a ballistic missile.

“One of the problems with the chemical laser is that first of all they’re too big and too heavy — and you have to carry the chemicals with you,” Afzal told CNBC on Friday.  “With an electric laser, your platform which is driving, sailing, flying around, usually has a power system that can recharge your battery back.  But in a chemical laser, once the chemicals are gone you have to go back to the depot.”

The SHiELD program includes a beam control system to direct the laser onto a target, a housing pod mounted on the fighter jet to power and cool the laser and the high-energy laser source itself.

Lockheed Martin also recently demonstrated a laser capable of being based on the ground or at sea for the military.

In September, the company demonstrated its Advanced Test High Energy Asset, or ATHENA, in tests run by the Army’s Space and Missile Defense Command at White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico..

The laser brought down five Outlaw drones.

“The tests at White Sands against aerial targets validated our lethality models and replicated the results we’ve seen against static targets at our own test range,” Keoki Jackson, Lockheed Martin’s chief technology officer, said in a statement in September.

(UNQUOTE)

The Air Force Research Laboratory’s Directed Energy Directorate is based at Kirtland Air Force Base in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

………..

Norio Hayakawa’s CIVILIAN INTELLIGENCE NEWS SERVICE

E-mail = noriohayakawa@gmail.com

Facebook = http://www.facebook.com/fernandon.hayakawa

My views on the alleged Project Blue Beam

Although there is no credible documentary evidence whatsoever of the existence of NASA’s Project Blue Beam, it has been a popular conspiracy theory  (some people call this the ultimate conspiracy)  since around 1994 when it was first introduced by a Canadian journalist by the name of Serge Monast.

The alleged Project Blue Beam claims that in the far future NASA will attempt to implement a New Age religion with the Antichrist at its head to establish a New World Order  (a.k.a., a One World Government, a Global Government, a Global Order),  via a technologically-simulated Second Coming.

My realistic view is that at this point in time, we do not have enough sophisticated technologies yet to implement this alleged program.  It would probably take another 25 to 30 years before we will have all those technologies to orchestrate a global, simultaneous event as the one described in this conspiracy.

By the way, proponents of this theory allege that Monast and another unnamed journalist, who both died of heart attacks in 1996, were in fact assassinated, and that the Canadian government kidnapped Monast’s daughter in an effort to dissuade him from investigating Project Blue Beam.

(On a personal level, for a short time I had the honor of corresponding with Serge Monast in 1993 and 1994.

Of course it was quite a shock to me when I found out in 1996 that he had suddenly passed away of a heart attack at his residence.)

The four steps, as proposed by Serge Monast are:

STEP ONE:

This requires the breakdown of all archaeological knowledge.  This will apparently be accomplished by faking earthquakes at precise locations around the planet.  Fake “new discoveries” at these locations “will finally explain to all people the error of all fundamental religious doctrines”, specifically Christian and Muslim doctrines.

STEP TWO:

This involves a gigantic “space show” wherein three-dimensional holographic laser projections will be beamed all over the planet — and this is where Blue Beam really takes off.  The projections will take the shape of whatever deity is most predominant, and will speak in all languages. At the end of this light show, the gods will all merge into one god, the Antichrist.

STEP THREE:

This is “Telepathic Electronic Two-Way Communication.”  It involves making people think their god is speaking to them through telepathy, projected into the head of each person individually using extreme low frequency radio waves.

STEP FOUR:

This has three parts:

Making humanity think an alien invasion is about to occur at every major city;

Making the Christians think the Rapture is about to happen;

A mixture of electronic and supernatural forces, allowing the supernatural forces to travel through fiber optics, coax, power and telephone lines to penetrate all electronic equipment and appliances, that will by then all have a special microchip installed.

For more on the alleged Project Blue Beam, listen to the following:

Also, please click the following and read about The ALIEN INTRUSION:

The ALIEN INTRUSION

……….

Norio Hayakawa’s CIVILIAN INTELLIGENCE NEWS SERVICE

E- mail = noriohayakawa@gmail.com

Facebook = http://www.facebook.com/fernandon.hayakawa

Introduction to basic, Beginning Conversational Japanese (Lesson 3)

by Norio Hayakawa:

 

Polite form of Japanese verbs:

The verb “to be” =    desu      (is, am, are)

Watashi no tomodachi wa Supeingo no sensei desu.

(My friend is a Spanish language teacher.)

The negative form is dewa arimasen     (is not, am not, are not)

Mary Smith-san wa bengoshi dewa arimasen.

(Mary Smith is not a lawyer).

The past tense is deshita       (was, were)

VOCABULARY:    bashoplace      mukashilong time ago      eigakan = movie theater

Kono basho wa mukashi eigakan deshita.

(This place was a movie theater long time ago)

 

The verb “to go” =  ikimasu    (I go, you go, he/she goes, they go, we go, etc.)

Watashi wa ima gakkou e ikimasu.

(I go to school now.)

In Japanese, the present tense of the verb automatically becomes a future tense by adding adverbs of “time”, such as   ashita = tomorrow      atode = later    raishuu = next week

Watashi wa ashita gakkou e ikimasu. 

(I will go to school tomorrow)

In order to form the past tense of polite forms of Japanese verbs, all you have to do is remove the final su of the verb and replace with shita.

Watashitachi wa kinou Yokohama e ikimashita.

(We went to Yokohama yesterday).

Negative form of ikimasu =   ikimasen    (I do not go, you do not go, he/she does not go, we do not go, etc. etc.)

In other words, the negative form of the verb is made simply by removing the su, and replacing with sen.

VOCABULARY:

tabemasu =   (I eat, you eat, he/she eats, we eat, you eat, they eat)

tabemasen =    (I do not eat, you do not eat, he/she does not eat, we do not eat, you do not eat, they do not eat)

arukimasu =   (I walk, you walk, he/she walks, we walk, you walk, they walk)

arukimasen =   (I do not walk, you do not walk, he/she does not walk, etc. etc.)

kakimasu =   (I write, you write, he/she writes, we write, you write, they write)

kakimasen =   (I do not write, you do not write, he/she does not write, we do not write, etc. etc.)

That’s enough for Lesson 3.

……..

Norio Hayakawa’s CIVILIAN INTELLIGENCE NEWS SERVICE

E-mail = noriohayakawa@gmail.com

Facebook = http://www.facebook.com/fernandon.hayakawa

Also please watch Norio Hayakawa’s YouTube Channel

Remembering our American heroes – -the most decorated unit in U.S. history fought for a country that didn’t accept them

 

The 442nd Regimental Combat Team was made up of Japanese-Americans, many of whom served when their families were imprisoned behind barbed wires.

by Kimberly Yam, HUFFPOST  – – November 10, 2017:

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/442-regimental-combat-team_us_5a06209fe4b05673aa593f8f

(QUOTE)

As Americans look back and honor service members across the country on Veterans Day  (as well as on Memorial Day) , one unit’s work is largely left out of the mainstream conversation.

But the 442nd Regimental Combat Team’s contributions to the country are nothing short of remarkable.

With the motto “Go for broke,” the unit was made up of Japanese-Americans who served the U.S. during World War II ― a time of rampant anti-Japanese sentiment.

As many of their civilian loved ones were imprisoned behind barbed wire after the bombing of Pearl Harbor, the team accrued an impressive combat record, becoming the most decorated unit in U.S. military history for its size and length of service.

And they did this all the while enduring racism and xenophobia at home, said Mitch Maki, president of Go For Broke National Education Center, which spreads awareness around the Japanese-American soldiers.

“Many of them decided they were going to serve because they knew this was the only way to prove their loyalty and create a better place for themselves as well as for their families,” Maki told HuffPost.

“Many of these young men believed that loyalty needed to be demonstrated in blood.”

(An estimated 33,000 Japanese Americans served in the U.S. military during World War II, of which 20,000 joined the Army.  Approximately 800 were killed in action.)

The 442nd RCT, which was formed on March 23, 1943, included mostly second-generation, or “Nisei,” soldiers, who were the children of Japanese immigrants.

The unit included both draftees and volunteers, according to the nonprofit Densho, which preserves the history of Japanese-American incarceration during World War II.

The 442nd’s formation marked a turning point in the U.S. military’s wartime policy.

Following the bombing of Pearl Harbor, people of Japanese ancestry had actually been barred from service as “enemy aliens,” 4-C, by the U.S. War Department while xenophobic sentiment swept the country.

“We kept asking, ‘What can we do?   How do we change things?’   We were upset that we did not have a chance to prove our loyalty,” Nisei veteran Kenjiro Akune, who ended up being placed in Japanese-American intelligence unit, Military Intelligence Service, told HuffPost.

According to Densho, the need for more soldiers and the lobbying efforts of the Japanese-American community and its supporters eventually swayed leaders’ views.

The work of the 100th Battalion also played a significant part in altering opinions.

The battalion was made up of Japanese-Americans who had been part of the Hawaii National Guard at the time of the attack on Pearl Harbor, before Japanese-Americans were prohibited from service.

By law, the Nisei who were already members of the National Guard could not be forced out, and they eventually formed the 100th.

This particular group of men developed such a stunning training record that it helped inspire leaders to reverse the exclusionary military service policy.

“They basically changed the minds of military and political leaders who had banned the enlistment and drafting of Japanese-Americans after Pearl Harbor,” Pauline Yoshihashi, a spokeswoman for Go For Broke whose father is a veteran of the 442nd, told HuffPost.

The 100th eventually merged with the 442nd, and in just over a year’s time, they proved to be an extraordinarily valuable team.

 

The unit won seven Distinguished Unit Citations, presented to units who demonstrate exceptional heroism in action against an armed enemy.

President Harry Truman presented one of the citations himself, telling the members, “you fought the enemy abroad and prejudice at home, and you won.”

They also racked up 21 Medals of Honor, 4,000 Purple Hearts, 29 Distinguished Service Crosses, 588 Silver Stars and more than 4,000 Bronze Stars.

The group’s immense contributions in the war include helping to liberate several towns, including Bruyeres and Biffontaine, France, as well as the sub-camps of the Nazi concentration camp Dachau.

The Japanese-American soldiers took on incredible risks.

In one particularly memorable engagement, the 442nd was ordered to rescue the “Lost Battalion,” white U.S. soldiers who were stranded on a ridge near Saint-Dié, France, attempting to withstand heavy enemy fire.

Two other battalions had already failed to rescue the battalion, which was running low on food, water and supplies, according to Densho.

The military decided to send in the 442nd.

“They were given some of the assignments in which they knew they were cannon fodder.

They knew that they would be suicide missions,” Maki told HuffPost.  “The unspoken message was that they were expendable.”

They knew that they would be suicide missions.

The unspoken message was that they were expendable.

The Nisei fought for six days, finally breaking through to the Lost Battalion and rescuing the 211 soldiers.  But in the process, they sustained 800 casualties, Maki explained.

When returning to life in the U.S., the soldiers continued to experience racism, despite their service to the country.

In interview outtakes for PBS documentary “The War,” the late Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii), who had earned several medals and distinctions for his service in the 442nd, recalled that he had attempted to get a haircut in a barbershop in Oakland, California.

Dressed in uniform, Inouye entered a shop that had three empty chairs, he said.

After verifying that  Inouye was of Japanese descent, a barbershop employee told Inouye he didn’t “cut Jap hair.”

“And I thought to myself, here I am in uniform.

It should be obvious to him that I’m an American soldier, a captain at that,” Inouye said.  “And that fellow very likely never went to war.  And he’s telling me, ‘We don’t cut Jap hair.’”

READ THE WHOLE STORY HERE:

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/442-regimental-combat-team_us_5a06209fe4b05673aa593f8f

…..

Norio Hayakawa’s CIVILIAN INTELLIGENCE NEWS SERVICE

E-mail = noriohayakawa@gmail.com

Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/fernandon.hayakawa

Please also watch Norio Hayakawa’s YouTube videos