ARE THEY EXTRATERRESTRIALS? – OR, DECEPTIVE “INTERDIMENSIONALS”?
It is a well-known fact that John A. Keel and Jacques Vallee were two of the first big name researchers who had departed from the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis (ETH) of the origins of UFOs and the UFO phenomenon.
Although it is still considered to be a minority view in the field of Ufology, quite a number of researchers followed suit, including J. Allen Hynek, Arthur C. Clarke, Whitley Strieber, John Mack, Karla Turner, Guy Malone, Joseph G. Jordan and L.A. Marzulli.
Many of them seem to have gone from ETH to the “Fallen” and “Malevolent”.
They seem to have concluded that UFOs are inter-dimensional and not from outer space.
I totally agree.
Since the late 1970s, I, too, have maintained (and will continue to maintain) my opinion that we have never been visited by physical ETs in their physical spacecraft.
In fact, science has yet to prove that UFOs represent any conclusive evidence whatsoever of physical ET visitations.
The reality, in my opinion, is that “they” are deceptive, manipulative and malevolent entities from another dimension, “posing” and deceiving us as “ETs” from highly advanced civilizations from outer space.
This does not mean that “benevolent” ones do not exist.
Perhaps they are doing good works without being seen by most of us. But the ones that are “making noise”, deceiving people and causing “confusion” are certainly not the “benevolent” ones.
Tom Farmer, a researcher, stated:
“John A. Keel pointed out 50+ years ago that UFOs come in too many form factors, “crash” too often and spout too much nonsense to contactees to be nuts-and-bolts spacecraft crewed by explorers from afar.
They are a current-frame-of-reference manifestations of a trickster intelligence that has always been with us.”
HERE ARE MY COMMENTS:
The UFO phenomenon appears to be able to materialize and de-materialize at will, at least to the perception of the observer.
But more significant is its apparent inability to stay in our dimensional realm except for a few moments at a time, or only for a short period of time.
As Dr. Jacques Vallee suggested quite often, “UFOs” may not necessarily be objects nor are they “flying” as we understand “flying” by the use of any propulsion system.
Yet they are even said to be able to affect our physical parameters (such as radar, etc.)
It seems to me that in many cases a “UFO”, after making an initial appearance to what I call a “pre-selected” observer (or observers), simply appears to take off at a tremendous speed and disappear into the distance as if utilizing some form of advanced propulsion system.
But could this be a deception?
In other cases, “UFOs” seem to simply hover or “float” (again, as if they’re utilizing some form of a propulsion system capable of “floating”) before taking off or even de-materializing.
But again, could this be a deception?
I believe it is.
Norio Hayakawa’s CIVILIAN INTELLIGENCE NEWS SERVICE
E-mail = email@example.com
Facebook = http://www.facebook.com/fernandon.hayakawa